namazu-users-en
[Top] [All Lists]

[Namazu-users-en] Re: [ (can't open the index) ]] (Solved!)

2007-04-10 21:32:56
Tadamasa Teranishi <yw3t-trns(_at_)asahi-net(_dot_)or(_dot_)jp> [2007-04-09 
23:05]:
rex wrote:

You should read the manual. see doc/en/manual.html.

The directions in the namazu-sample are not consistent with the
directions in the manual. How is the reader to know which is correct?

No. Because namazurc-sample (It is not namazu-sample.) is installed 
in "$(sysconfdir)/$(PACKAGE)/". 
"namazurc-sample" is copied onto "namazurc" by the directory of
"$(sysconfdir)/$(PACKAGE)/".

This becomes RC file read the first so. 
("$(sysconfdir)/$(PACKAGE)/namazurc")

A minimum setting is completed by this. 

It is not indispensable to put the RC file on the same directory 
as "namazu.cgi". 

I know. I prefer to keep config files with the code.
 
".namazurc" is needed for the first time in the same directory as 
"namazu.cgi" so that only CGI may change the setting. 
 
Wouldn't it be wise to make the information in namazu-sample clear?

It is certain not to have enhanced the document. 
However, if the manual is read, it understands. 

For example:

Do at least one of these three things:

1) Copy namazu-sample -> ~/.namazurc
   (Necessary to run namazu as a user)

2) Copy namazu-sample -> .namazurc in the directory where namazu.cgi is 
located
   (This or the step below is necessary for namazu.cgi)

3) Copy namazu-sample ->  $(sysconfdir)/$(PACKAGE)/namazurc
   (Usually, /usr/local/etc/namazu/namazurc)

This is not correct. 
# Perhaps, it is not likely to be able to understand still correctly. 

However, after it corrects it to a correct content, such a sample 
might have to be shown. 

How about inserting a correct version in namazurc-sample?


Now, I'm trying to understand why sorting by date appears not to work
correctly with files created with MHonArc and indexed with mknmz with
the --mhonarc option.

Please retrieve the archive of ML of the UTC field sort about the 
date sorting. 

The date sorting is sorting of the time of the file of the stamp. 
It is not because of being sorted in date displayed in the 
retrieval result the order. 

OK, did that. Details in a new thread.

Thanks,

-rex
_______________________________________________
Namazu-users-en mailing list
Namazu-users-en(_at_)namazu(_dot_)org
http://www.namazu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/namazu-users-en