Scott Schwartz <schwartz(_at_)bio(_dot_)cse(_dot_)psu(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Perhaps "next -part" would be the right user interface (ignoring all
coding considerations) to step thru attachements, leaving "next" for
whole messages.
Agreed.
It seems to me that the main difficulty is that mh stores one message
per file, but MIME ruins that model by introducing nesting.
Wonder if something like burst that takes message m with attachments
and creates files m.n would be useful...
--
Bill Wohler <wohler(_at_)newt(_dot_)com> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG
ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.