On 28 Sep, Harald Geyer wrote:
If you are going to apply my patch then please also apply the changes
proposed by Robert Elz. Other than that I don't know of any issues.
I'm using it since I posted it to the list. Don't know whether anybody
else is testing it too.
I heard no complaints so I've applied the patch (+ proposed changes) and
backed out the old workaround. It'd be good if you can check that what I
put in CVS is correct.
Can we perhaps sort out giving CVS access to some more of the people
that have written patches recently? I don't mind clearing a backlog of
patches but I don't want to be dealing with all future patches. And as
this vfork issue has shown, it is very difficult to fully understand all
the patches.
Oliver
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers