My two cents on this fix is to just increase the buffer size and skip the dynamic allocation. Memory is really cheap these days. The nmh code is littered with "efficiencies" that made sense when running on a VAX but a now liabilities. Keep it simple. Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), David Levine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), Peter Maydell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), David Levine |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1), Peter Maydell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |