nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] extending nmh for smtps support?

2010-11-13 10:27:12
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:30:31 EST, JerryHeyman said:

I see that at http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers, port 465 is called
"urd", but on my Mandriva 2009.1 Linux system I see:

[jerry(_at_)unix smtp]$ grep 465 /etc/services
smtps           465/tcp                         # SMTP over SSL (TLS)

I apologize for my ignorance, I actually thought that the info in my local
/etc/services would be accurate, especially as AT&T called it the same thing.

Common confusion.

IANA is the 'de jure' standard, /etc/services is the 'de facto' standard.

Trying to claim that the actual real-world use of 465 is "illegal" is just
urinating into the wind, because there's a heck of a lot of the broken (yes,
it's non-standard compliant - using the STARTTLS verb on 587 is correct) SMTP
on 465 than there is 'urd' (whatever *that* is).

Attachment: pgpYKw0BzSZ8s.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>