rader(_at_)hep(_dot_)wisc(_dot_)edu wrote:
Thanks. This doesn't actually apply to current head of git,
[...]
Anyway, some nitpicking on points of detail:
That's not nitpicking--just good code reviewing. My C skills really
suck. Sorry.
I like everything you've said. I'll send along a better patch for
consideration soon.
Cool. One I missed is that I think we do need to have something
for signal handling: with current whatnow if you hit ^C at the
prompt then whatnow exits with status 1 (we catch the SIGINT and
return NULL from getans() so whatnow exits cleanly). In the
readline version, if you hit ^C at the prompt then whatnow exits
with status 130, ie command terminated with a signal, and the
caller of getans() didn't get control back.
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers