Jerrad wrote:
I do not think msh should be discarded. At worst, a build time option,
but you never know when you might want/need it, so why not build it?
It's a single, documented useful utility that provides a useful
complement to packf. I've not had *much* call for it, but it's nice
to know it's there if I do want to interact with a mail archive in a
familiar way.
Paul wrote:
fwiw i still like msh. i've used it as a login shell for some captive
accounts.
Thanks. Let's keep msh.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers