On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:05:21 -0500, Ken Hornstein said:
I'm not such in favor of that part. I'm probably going to implement better multipart/signed and multipart/encrypted support, and keeping around the original message would be a requirement for that.
Actually, you don't need the *original* message for that, you need the *canonical* form that signatures are computed across. I'd have to check exactly what S/MIME wants, but for GPG, if you saved the "original" that has Q-P encoding, you have to un-Q-P it each time you want to verify the signature.
pgpATOh3EZy6y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |