It seems that this behavior is generally what you want...
Agreed. I wasn't trying to get it changed, just that its behaviour is
non-obvious and undocumented. Yes, I know, patches welcome. :-)
Well, putting it in the mark(1) man page wouldn't be accurate, as it's
really a feature of every nmh program that update sequences. But ...
would you be happy with an update to mh-sequence(5) ? That's not
a wonderful place either, because really that's something more involved
with nmh internals, and there's nothing that really talks about how
sequences are implemented. I'm not even sure mh-sequence(5) is the right
place, since that's talking about things from a user perspective.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers