Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
>> On 2013-10-16, at 12:24 PM, Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com>
wrote:
>>
>>> - Support the composition and display of format=flowed messages.
>>
>> This is long overdue, and should not be hard to implement.
> Does that mean I can put you down for implementing it? :-)
Composition and display are different problems. Getting the reply
setup from a format=flowed would address 90% of the problem.
It might be that it's enough also to just know how to specify that the text
is like that, and leave it to exmh/mh-e/vim-macros etc. to get it right.
> RFC 3676 tells you how. But let's say you have some source code you want
> put in your draft; you probably don't want to have that set to reflow.
> So how do you indicate that? Something like mhbuild directives? Just
> thinking out loud here; what do others want to see?
I wasn't sure that format=flowed even made specific provisions for that.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on
rails [
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers