Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
>> I use mh-e, so it's really not, for me, MH's problem. What I would
>> prefer is an MH-level filter that transforms format=fakeflowed into
>> real format=flowed. (I would really like that filter to stick in
>> front of mailman too..). So the stuff on disk would be
>> format=flowed!!!
> If you can figure out a reasonable algorithm to detect
> format=fakeflowed, I'm all ears. I don't really think it needs to be
> on-disk ... if all of the utilities output it properly, then why is
> that necessary?
1) grep. ( I also want the base64, and quoted printable removed...)
2) I think that mh-e uses the files directly, but I could be wrong.
3) active vs passive data.
>> everyone else is afraid to do something that would confuse outlook
>> users.
> I am under the impression that most MUAs can HANDLE format=flowed just
> fine. It's just they don't send it when they should.
I'm not convinced, but maybe we should do the experiment.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on
rails [
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers