Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again


On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit(_at_)pthbb(_dot_)org> 
wrote:

Wouldn't a FUSE IMAP layer largely solve the problem of conflicts
by working on the live data store? Perhaps a customization of
something like:


No. nmh works in many places FUSE will never enjoin.

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, (continued) Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Alexander Zangerl Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Todd M. Kover Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Jerrad Pierce Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg <= Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Jerrad Pierce Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg

Previous by Date:	Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein
Next by Date:	Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Jerrad Pierce
Next by Thread:	Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]