Re: [Nmh-workers] Suggested new switches for sortm: -recon and --norecon

Ralph wrote:

> sort(1) has this functionality.  It's -c for check.  -check?  Don't see
> why we should deviate.

sortm already has a -check, for a slightly different purpose.
It was recently added, though, so maybe its meaning could be
changed?

David

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers