Re: [Nmh-workers] Request for sortm feature to implement arbitrary messa

> path-name would name a command which would be invoked by sortm. It would be
> given 2 arguments, full path names of messages.

Are you suggesting that it be fork()ed and exec()d for each message (as
opposed to have a long-running program that gets executed just once per
sorm invocation)?  If so, it occurs to me that it would be simpler to
just make the > < decision based on the exit code of the process.

--Ken

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers