Ken wrote:
So, given what Norm has said ... what do people think? Implement,
or no?
I don't think so. It would be to support something that isn't in
usual messages. And wouldn't even be necessary with "Nag: 1" or
whatever, if Norm is willing to update all of his existing Nag
messages.
A quick and dirty test for the empty Nag might be something like
this, with GNU grep:
egrep --max-count=1 '^(Nag:|)$' | grep Nag:
No doubt others could come up with a more efficient test.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers