Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon(_at_)orthanc(_dot_)ca> wrote:
>> message numbers are, indeed, "the problem." when i asked mark crispen
>> why IMAP was so hostile to the message numbering concepts of MH, he
>> muttered something about MM.
> But he did buy into, and accept, the UID concept. We had that
> conversation in Steveston. After a lot of good, local, beer.
So, each message has a (U?)UID? Are the integers a subset of that?
If we never repack a folder, do we win?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on
rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers