ken wrote:
so: is reply attribution something that people that use replyfilter
miss?
I don't miss it ... but it might be both harder and easier than you think
to add it.
"Harder" because replyfilter doesn't have access to the _headers_ of the
message (the short reason for that is because mhl is stupid). That's
the reason you have the "formatarg" configuration parameters to mhl
that pass in the C-T and C-T-E headers.
"Easier" because you could add a fourth optional argument to the script
and add something like:
formatarg="%(pretty{from}) writes"
To the appropriate line in your mhl reply file.
thanks for those tips. i don't know that i'll do it anytime soon,
since i already have a solution, but maybe one of these days.
paul
=----------------------
paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma, where
it's 72.9 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers