pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PEM & parts for diff. recips. (was Re: Forwarding: Re: PEM - X.400 interoperability)

1993-01-25 22:13:00
You can actually do this with the mechanisms provided by the current I-D. The
first person creates the message and applies MIC-ONLY PEM to it. The result is
a multipart/pem. The second person reads it, approves of it (either with or
without comment).He then creates a new message, containing the signed original
as a subpart, and MIC-ONLY PEMs that. Presto -- two signatures. This can be
repeated as often as necessary.

This can of course be done but is not as compact nor as seemless as desired.  
What I had in mind was maybe a mechanism by which the 2nd and later signatures 
were done via an additional digest of the original msg. + comments if any, 
encrypted with the 2nd signer's private component, etc.

I agree that support for multiple signers under whatever context is an 
important 
area to standardize on.  Whether it's within the domain of PEM is another 
question as you've noted.  I am tempted to say it is.  And personally, I would 
like to see it supported with a minimal of MIME encapsulation.  (I am quite 
happy with the technique proposed for handling binary data using MIME 
encapsulation because it was a minimal encapsulation.)

-Ray

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: PEM & parts for diff. recips. (was Re: Forwarding: Re: PEM - X.400 interoperability), Raymond Lau <=