pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Certification procedure

1993-05-07 10:39:00
-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: cme(_at_)ellisun(_dot_)sw(_dot_)stratus(_dot_)com
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
 MIGbMAoGBFUIAQECAgP+A4GMADCBiAKBgCl79/jl0DEVl1GQzOHlzjDmChDDxnWO
 Acd7jShj2x1vclFh6vbHx9IJqkQdwNhNAWf8XnTrqBDN+VSBc1qdT6nSEAbNPxHD
 XcvY2DudhuRaRBVLgUQ4scTK657m90Q+bTL5yIh2MaFipUw9BgbIXPTDlksSskWP
 9oHjo+pCJC+lAgMBAAF=
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
 A+AS/UFQN9ZIJWQF4n2tdBcE1/iKssCmPop3OS2AbB1xngpM50/4rItw9udbetCk
 brpQE5/LLeGCfcCh1kfVcAre5QcEHthcLwSrAetoRiKSVJO0FQmo99zQ9hEx/izx
 Z2i59XlAovewFPqqTWH/2euscuM8iF4rVLApb13MHwI=




From: Peter Lipp <plipp(_at_)iaik(_dot_)tu-graz(_dot_)ac(_dot_)at>
Message-Id: 
<199305070715(_dot_)AA22245(_at_)iaik(_dot_)tu-graz(_dot_)ac(_dot_)at>
Subject: Re: Certification procedure
To: spock(_at_)RSA(_dot_)COM (Steve Dusse)
Date: Fri, 7 May 93 9:15:40 MET DST

all other valid Persona certificates.  This works OK for such
certificates, as our Low Assurance PCA statement will clearly indicate
that such certificates carry NO identity assurance. 

So what do I need them for? This seems to me like a drivers licence
in yellow, which means this may or may not be a valid drivers license
(or make it a passport or any other document). As long as it is known
to be insecure, does it have any practical value except showing "Hey,
I can send PEM messages"?

Peter,

I have been reading along and am now replying to you.  That means that
you and I are having a conversation.  You don't know with any assurance
where I work and I don't know where you work -- or anything else about
one another.

For this conversation, that doesn't matter.  I form my own opinions of
someone based on what he writes.

What does matter to me is that each message in a conversation be from
the same person.  For that, all I need is Persona certificates (or
RIPEM signatures, for that matter).

 - Carl

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>