PEM Dev (date)
May 30, 1993
- RIPEM Mac won't be the only one..., Jeffrey I. Schiller, 21:00
- RIPEM Mac 0.8b1 w/PEM certificate support, Raymond Lau, 19:55
- (DES-CBC)**3 Throughput (was Re: DES wonk's delite), Carl Ellison, 12:49
- Re: DES wonk's delite, Carl Ellison, 12:23
- Re: Re: Non-repudiation, Raymond Lau, 08:17
May 28, 1993
- Re: DES wonk's delite, Steve Kent, 14:41
- Re: EDE and encrypted IV's, Steve Kent, 12:40
- Re: What digital signatures "mean", Steve Kent, 11:55
- Fancy encryption schemes, Donald T. Davis, 11:52
- DES wonk's delite, TCJones, 10:42
- Change of address reuest, Dawn S Simon, 08:12
- Re: Triple DES, Carl Ellison, 06:38
May 27, 1993
- Repudiatng Non-repudiation, jueneman%wotan, 15:45
- Re: Triple DES, Steve Kent, 14:05
- Re: When messages are sent., gvb, 12:57
- Re: Liability for PCA's, John Lowry, 12:29
- Re: Triple DES, Carl Ellison, 11:47
- Re: Triple DES, Charles Kaufman dss, 11:09
- Re: When messages are sent., Steve Kent, 11:03
- Liability for PCA's, TCJones, 10:30
- When messages are sent., Steve Dusse, 10:20
- Re: Triple DES, Amanda Walker, 10:05
- Re: Non-repudiation, Steve Kent, 09:58
- Re: Fancy encryption schemes, Brad Huntting, 09:57
- When messages are sent., jueneman%wotan, 09:23
- Re: Re: Non-repudiation, jueneman%wotan, 08:24
- Re: Fancy encryption schemes, Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd), 07:20
- Re: Non-repudiation, Steve Kent, 07:19
May 25, 1993
- Re: Non-repudiation, Paul C. Clark, 20:09
- Re: Non-repudiation, Steve Kent, 18:32
- Re: Fancy encryption schemes, Raymond Lau, 18:00
- Re: Re: Non-repudiation, Raymond Lau, 16:17
- Re: exportable crypto, Jon Spencer, 14:30
- Re: exportable crypto, Stephen D Crocker, 14:24
- Re: EDE, Ned Freed, 13:33
- exportable crypto, Carl Ellison, 13:12
- Re: Triple DES, Mark Riordan, 11:51
- Re: DES IV's, and EDE3 vs. EDE2, Stephen D Crocker, 11:05
- Re: DES cycle lengths, Ned Freed, 10:58
- Re: EDE, Mark C. Henderson, 10:48
- Re: DES IV's, and EDE3 vs. EDE2, gnu, 10:44
- Re: Fancy encryption schemes, Carl Ellison, 09:52
- Fancy encryption schemes, jueneman%wotan, 09:31
- EDE, John Lowry, 08:54
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Charles Kaufman dss, 08:23
- Re: What digital signatures "mean", John Lowry, 08:02
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Russ_Housley . McLean_CSD, 07:27
- DES cycle lengths, jueneman%wotan, 06:59
- Re: Triple DES, agent: David Balenson, 06:53
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Carl Ellison, 06:46
May 24, 1993
- NOTICE: Multiple PEM-DEV messages, agent: David Balenson, 18:33
- What digital signatures "mean", jueneman%wotan, 17:57
- Re: Re: Non-repudiation, jueneman%wotan, 15:32
- non-repudiation, TCJones, 15:24
- DES^N, Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd), 14:37
- Re: subscription request, Dan Geer, 09:47
- subscription request, Donald T. Davis, 07:43
May 21, 1993
- Seeing double (and triple), pgut1, 20:32
- Re: DES modes..., Louis A. Mamakos, 18:45
- Re: DES modes..., Raymond Lau, 16:17
- Re: Non-repudiation, Steve Kent, 16:10
- Re: Triple DES, Steve Kent, 15:58
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Steve Kent, 15:50
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Ned Freed, 15:48
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Steve Kent, 15:39
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Steve Kent, 15:29
- EDE and encrypted IV's, TCJones, 14:57
- Export???? (Was Re: DES modes... ), Stephen D Crocker, 13:45
- DES modes..., Steve Dusse, 13:19
- Re: Triple DES, Carl Ellison, 13:15
- Re: Non-repudiation, Raymond Lau, 13:12
- Re: Triple DES, Raymond Lau, 12:51
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Brad Huntting, 12:30
- Non-repudiation, TCJones, 12:17
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Carl Ellison, 12:09
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Carl Ellison, 11:59
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Steve Kent, 11:57
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Stephen D Crocker, 11:55
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Carl Ellison, 11:47
- Re: Triple DES, Carl Ellison, 11:42
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Steve Kent, 11:30
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Stephen D Crocker, 11:29
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Steve Kent, 11:16
- Re: Triple DES, Steve Kent, 11:10
- Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Carl Ellison, 10:42
- Re: DES EDE vs. EEE, Carl Ellison, 10:29
- TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE, Stephen D Crocker, 10:19
- DES EDE vs. EEE, TCJones, 09:41
May 19, 1993
- PEM, Eric Watt Forste, 14:55
May 11, 1993
- Re: Mapping e-mail address to X.500 distinguished names for PEM., Steve Kent, 11:54
- Re: Mapping e-mail address to X.500 distinguished names for PEM., Peter Williams, 11:40
- Mapping e-mail address to X.500 distinguished names for PEM., Steve Dusse, 10:26
- Re: Mapping e-mail address to X.500 distinguished names for PEM., D F Sadok, 07:10
- Mapping e-mail address to X.500 distinguished names for PEM., Ali, 06:12
May 03, 1993
- RE: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Ned Freed, 17:15
- Re: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Steve Kent, 14:30
- Re: RE: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Raymond Lau, 14:24
- Re: Signed objects vs. signed comments, tardo, 14:18
- Re: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Stephen D Crocker, 14:07
- RE: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Ned Freed, 13:37
- RE: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Ned Freed, 13:09
- Re: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Stephen D Crocker, 10:38
- Re: Signed objects vs. signed comments, Thomas Casey, 10:02