Is anyone else having problems with all pem-dev messages coming in
duplicate or triplicate over the last few days? Every single message I've
had from this list has been doubled, and some may have been tripled (I've
just waded through 60 messages which represent about 12 hours worth of mail
from pem-dev). The duplicates are interleaved, not one after the other, so
that there might be 4 or 5 other messages and several hours time seperating
them. This only happens with pem-dev mail.... here are the (partial)
headers from one of the duplicates:
From daemon Sat May 22 11:32:15 1993
[ received-by junk ]
Date: 21 May 1993 14:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ned Freed <NED(_at_)SIGURD(_dot_)INNOSOFT(_dot_)COM>
Subject: Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE
Message-Id: <01GYFXNWAFHG8ZDVUL(_at_)SIGURD(_dot_)INNOSOFT(_dot_)COM>
Sender: pem-dev-relay(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
To: Stephen D Crocker <crocker(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM>
Cc: pem-dev(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM, crocker(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
From daemon Sat May 22 13:08:36 1993
[ received-by junk ]
Date: 21 May 1993 07:01:36 +0000 (GMT)
From: NED(_at_)SIGURD(_dot_)INNOSOFT(_dot_)COM (Ned Freed)
Subject: Re: TIS/PEM will probably have exprimental support for EDE
Sender: pem-dev-relay(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
To: pem-dev(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
Message-Id: <01GYFXNWAFHG8ZDVUL(_at_)SIGURD(_dot_)INNOSOFT(_dot_)COM>
Note that in the first message pem-dev-relay is cc-ing it back to pem-dev -
could this be where the problem lies? The fact that people are replying to
pem-dev-relay instead of pem-dev?
Peter.
(pem-dev lurker).