This is definitely a problem with the definition of DER in X.509. It is not addressed in X.509 (93) or in ISO 8825-3 (CER and DER) either. RFC 1422 should mandate one of the two encodings, and someone should write a defect report on the relevant standards. Or RFC 1422 could just drop the "OPTIONAL" keyword... / Rich
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Steve Kent |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau |
| Previous by Thread: | Requesting certificates, TCJones |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Proper way to represent a NULL..., Ned Freed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |