pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: X.500 inevitable?

1993-08-16 10:43:00
Some of us have X.500 now but don't use it to hold email addresses yet...

Since most of the discussion about DN's is outside the scope of the PEM
RFC's and X.500 is to loose, should we define just a subset that
hopefully is simple, clear and would allow implementors and the users
to get going. 

Maybe the theory guys should have a holiday and let the engineers have a
play (:->

Pete.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: X.500 inevitable?, p . churchyard <=