Some of us have X.500 now but don't use it to hold email addresses yet... Since most of the discussion about DN's is outside the scope of the PEM RFC's and X.500 is to loose, should we define just a subset that hopefully is simple, clear and would allow implementors and the users to get going. Maybe the theory guys should have a holiday and let the engineers have a play (:-> Pete.
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: X.500 inevitable?, Steve Kent |
---|---|
Next by Date: | AVA's in DN's, TCJones |
Previous by Thread: | Access to private keys..., p . churchyard |
Next by Thread: | AVA's in DN's, TCJones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |