PEM Dev (date)

August 31, 1993

Role certificates and signatures - do they mean anything?, peace, 21:57
Re: PCA Policies, Steve Kent, 12:12
Re: PCA Policies, Steve Kent, 10:49
TechMail-PEM now available., Jeffrey I. Schiller, 09:42

August 25, 1993

PGP now a commercial product!!!!, peace, 15:01

August 24, 1993

serials, multiple originator MICs, Peter Williams, 09:12

August 23, 1993

PEM RFCs in PS Form, Sead Muftic, 07:50

August 22, 1993

Re: dname rules, Stephen D Crocker, 18:23
Re: dname rules, Stephen D Crocker, 18:18
Re: Organizational Agents, jueneman%wotan, 10:13

August 21, 1993

Organizational Agents, Richard . Ankney, 13:31
Organizational Agents, jueneman%wotan, 10:02

August 20, 1993

Re: dname rules, jueneman%wotan, 11:22
Composite Attributes, TCJones, 10:07
Re: dname rules, Mark Wahl, 09:37
Encryption software for Internet-MCI Mail Connection, David H. Rothman, 09:32
Re: dname rules, jueneman%wotan, 07:47
dname rules (was: Re: PCA Policies), Stephen D Crocker, 05:06
Re: Re: PCA Policies, jueneman%wotan, 04:36
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Mark Wahl, 04:11
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Mark Wahl, 02:23
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Mark Wahl, 02:06
Re: PCA Policies, Mark Wahl, 01:52
Re: Re: PCA Policies, Theodore Ts'o, 01:06

August 19, 1993

Re: Linking disclaimers to DNs, Theodore Ts'o, 22:59
Re: Re: PCA Policies, jueneman%wotan, 16:39
PCA Policies - Legal Notice and Disclaimer, jueneman%wotan, 16:04
Re: PCA Policies, John Lowry, 15:24
Re: Re: PEM/MIME OCR format, jueneman%wotan, 15:10
Re: Linking disclaimers to DNs, jueneman%wotan, 15:05
Re: PEM/MIME OCR format, John Lowry, 14:52
Linking disclaimers to DNs, John Lowry, 14:48
PCA Policies, jueneman%wotan, 14:30
RE: RE: Linking authorizations to the DN, P . V . McMahon . rea0803, 14:25
PEM/MIME OCR format, jueneman%wotan, 12:41
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, jueneman%wotan, 12:41
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, jueneman%wotan, 12:37
RE: Linking authorizations to the DN, John Lowry, 12:25
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Harald T. Alvestrand, 12:19
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Peter Williams, 11:13
Re: Recent X.500 discussions [atypical DN's], Mark Wahl, 10:27
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Mark Wahl, 10:09
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, D F Sadok, 09:06
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, John Lowry, 08:58
Advance Program for 1st ACM Conference on Computer and, Ravi Sandhu, 05:57
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Mark Wahl, 04:32
[no subject], p . churchyard, 03:57
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, D F Sadok, 02:37

August 18, 1993

Re: Register Some Respect, Einar Stefferud, 21:40
PEM purpose, Doug Porter, 21:29
Re: Register Some Respect, Peter Williams, 19:20
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Peter Williams, 18:37
Register Some Respect, TCJones, 17:53
Re: Registration word games, Marshall Rose, 16:44
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Marshall Rose, 16:41
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, jueneman%wotan, 15:57
Liability disclaimers in PCA's policies, jueneman%wotan, 15:36
Registration word games, TCJones, 10:34
Re: The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Peter Williams, 09:50
SFTTL, Paul Lambert, 08:52
The relationship between an entry and a real-world object, Marshall Rose, 08:41
standards-track PEM specifications and conformant implementations, Peter Williams, 07:56
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Steve Kent, 06:59
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, Steve Kent, 06:47
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Doug Porter, 00:14
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Doug Porter, 00:13
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Doug Porter, 00:13
Re: Poll, Doug Porter, 00:13

August 17, 1993

RE: Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, P . V . McMahon . rea0803, 18:40
Re: My Name is my name, Ned Freed, 16:56
My Name is my name, TCJones, 15:57
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, Charlie Watt, 15:55
Re: Linking authorizations to the DN, jueneman%wotan, 14:24
Linking authorizations to the DN, Charlie Watt, 12:53
Re: AVA's in DN's, Ned Freed, 11:20
Re: X.500 Directories, jueneman%wotan, 09:49
Re: Purpose of PEM string, William C Green, 06:52
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, jueneman%wotan, 06:09
What are these?, Warren Victorian, 03:01
Assertions About Attributes of Names, Steve Dusse, 02:56
Re: What are these?, Peter Gutmann, 02:53

August 16, 1993

Re: Assertions About Attributes, Richard . Ankney, 18:31
White Pages Listings - under whose control, TCJones, 17:22
X.500 Directories, Richard . Ankney, 16:35
Signature Roles, TCJones, 16:00
Assertions About Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 15:20
PEM Interoperability and X.500, jueneman%wotan, 15:01
Assertions About Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 15:00
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Steve Kent, 14:59
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 14:57
The X.500 is a poor paradigm, Steve Kent, 14:54
Assertions About Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 14:48
The X.500 is a poor paradigm, TCJones, 14:23
PEM-DEV Archives Now Available via Anonymous FTP!!, agent: David Balenson, 14:21
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Steve Kent, 14:20
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Steve Kent, 14:09
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Robert W. Shirey, 13:55
Assertions About Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 13:42
Anyother security standards around?, TCJones, 13:42
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Steve Kent, 12:50
Re: Re[2]: NULL - OPTIONAL?, Paul C. Clark, 12:37
AVA's in DN's, Steve Kent, 12:20
Re: Assertions About Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 11:55
Re: Re: Organizational Roles, Theodore Ts'o, 11:42
Re[2]: NULL - OPTIONAL?, burt, 11:39
Re: X.500 inevitable?, pak0, 11:14
Cross-mailing list info on X500 usage., p . churchyard, 10:51
AVA's in DN's, TCJones, 10:51
Re: X.500 inevitable?, p . churchyard, 10:43
Re: X.500 inevitable?, Steve Kent, 10:42
RE: Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, P . V . McMahon, 09:57
X.500 inevitable?, gnu, 09:25
Re: Access to private keys..., burt, 09:18
Access to private keys..., p . churchyard, 09:06
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, Steve Kent, 08:22
Re: Organizational Roles, Steve Kent, 08:08
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Steve Kent, 08:01
Re: Names, Steve Kent, 07:49
Re: Corporate person?, Steve Kent, 07:37
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, Steve Kent, 07:33
Re: Poll, Richard . Ankney, 07:31
Re: Certificates, Names and Attributes, Steve Kent, 07:15
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Charlie Watt, 06:30
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Robert W. Shirey, 05:56
[no subject], p . churchyard, 05:49
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Doug Porter, 00:34
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Doug Porter, 00:33
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Doug Porter, 00:33

August 15, 1993

Re: Names, Ned Freed, 19:39
Re: Organizational Roles, Richard . Ankney, 17:32
Re: Assertions About Attributes, Richard . Ankney, 17:32
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 16:42
Names, TCJones, 15:58
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, jueneman%wotan, 12:37
Re: Assertions About Attributes of Names, Ned Freed, 10:57
Re: Corporate person?, Ned Freed, 10:11

August 14, 1993

Re: Corporate person?, Rex A. Buddenberg, 22:25
Corporate person?, TCJones, 20:08
Assertions About Attributes of Names, TCJones, 16:48
Re: Certificates, Names and Attributes, jueneman%wotan, 13:25
Eternal DNs and UIDs, jueneman%wotan, 13:25
Re: Purpose of PEM string, jueneman%wotan, 11:47
Re: Re: Organizational Roles, jueneman%wotan, 10:53

August 13, 1993

Certificates, Names and Attributes, TCJones, 16:39
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Steve Kent, 15:42
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Steve Kent, 15:39
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Doug Porter, 13:31
Re: Purpose of PEM string, Doug Porter, 13:31
Re: Organizational Roles, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 13:24
Organizational Roles, jueneman%wotan, 10:23
Disclaimer field in X.509, jueneman%wotan, 09:20
Chance to fix X.509, Mike Roe, 06:38

August 12, 1993

Re: PEM-MIME (or is it MIME-PEM?), Steve Kent, 08:04
Re: The size of the PEM working group, Robert W. Shirey, 06:56
Re: PEM-MIME (or is it MIME-PEM?), p . churchyard, 05:03
Re: PEM-MIME, jueneman%wotan, 04:58

August 11, 1993

Meeting Announcement -- American Bar Assn., Frank Sudia, 18:28
Re: PEM-MIME, Stephen D Crocker, 16:21
The size of the PEM working group, Stephen D Crocker, 16:06
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 15:38
Signatures yet again, TCJones, 15:10
Re: Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 14:58
Re: PEM-MIME, Steve Kent, 14:50
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Steve Kent, 12:49
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Steve Kent, 12:46
Re: NULL - OPTIONAL?, Paul C. Clark, 11:04
Re: PEM-MIME, Stephen D Crocker, 10:19
RE: PEM-MIME, p . churchyard, 09:50
Online PCA's, TCJones, 09:26
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, jueneman%wotan, 09:03
NULL - OPTIONAL?, TCJones, 08:41
RE:, p . churchyard, 08:31
[no subject], p . churchyard, 08:27
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Stephen D Crocker, 08:20
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Christian Huitema, 07:57
Re: A simple PEM-MIME proposal, Stephen D Crocker, 07:56
A simple PEM-MIME proposal, Christian Huitema, 07:49
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Steve Kent, 07:49
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, kaufman, 07:35
PEM RFCs in PS, Sead Muftic, 07:28
PEM by any other name, Robert W. Shirey, 06:05
signatures..., p . churchyard, 04:48
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Christian Huitema, 03:49

August 10, 1993

Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, jueneman%wotan, 16:22
Re: Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 15:40
Re: PCA policies re legally binding signatures, Vinton G. Cerf, 12:53
IPRA Functions, jueneman%wotan, 11:04
PCA policies re legally binding signatures, jueneman%wotan, 10:50
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Charlie Watt, 08:39
Re: PEM RFCs in Postscript, Steve Kent, 07:26
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 07:18
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Steve Kent, 07:09
PEM RFCs in Postscript, Wolfgang Schneider, 05:00
Digital Signatures Considered, peace, 04:59

August 09, 1993

Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 20:55
Re: PCA in court, Vinton G. Cerf, 18:23
PCA in court, TCJones, 17:50
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Louis A. Mamakos, 17:46
Signatures may not mean much?, TCJones, 17:26
RE: Signatures clarified, Doug Porter, 16:54
Re: Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 16:53
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 16:53
Re: PEM Purposes, Doug Porter, 16:53
RE: PEM Purposes, Doug Porter, 16:53
RE: Let's get real!, Doug Porter, 16:53
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Stephen D Crocker, 16:29
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Vinton G. Cerf, 16:20
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Stephen D Crocker, 16:11
Re: Re: Key & Signature responsibility, jueneman%wotan, 12:15
Signatures downgraded???, TCJones, 10:34
Re: everything, p . churchyard, 09:42
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Stephen D Crocker, 09:03
Let's get real!, Robert W. Shirey, 08:02
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Jeff Kimmelman, 07:23
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 06:47
RE: PEM Purposes, Charlie Watt, 06:34
Re: Purpose of PEM, John Linn, 06:02
Re: >Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 05:25
RE: PEM Purposes, Doug Porter, 05:25
RE: Key & Signature responsibility, Doug Porter, 05:25
Key & Signature responsibility, jueneman%wotan, 05:25
Re: >Purpose of PEM, Carl Ellison, 05:25
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Doug Porter, 05:24
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 05:24
Re: >Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 05:24
RE: Why are we here?, Doug Porter, 05:24
RE: PEM Purpose, Doug Porter, 05:24

August 06, 1993

Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 14:46
Re: >Purpose of PEM, Paul Lambert, 13:07
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Jeff Kimmelman, 12:52
Re: Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 11:54
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 11:54
Re: Re: Key & Signature responsibility, jueneman%wotan, 11:09
Re: Secret Key Management, Richard . Ankney, 08:33
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 08:06
Re: Secret Key Management, Charlie Watt, 08:00
Re: Purpose of PEM, Robert W. Shirey, 06:19
Signature Significance (fwd), p . churchyard, 04:24
Secret Key Management, peace, 01:08

August 05, 1993

Re: PEM request, Raymond Lau, 18:52
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Doug Porter, 17:05
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 17:05
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 17:05
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 17:05
Re: Signature Significance, jueneman%wotan, 15:21
Re: Secret vs. Public KD, jueneman%wotan, 15:16
Signature Significance, Charles W. Gardiner, 14:13
Secret vs. Public KD, Steve Kent, 14:08
Re: Re: Key & Signature responsibility, jueneman%wotan, 12:05
Signature Significance, TCJones, 11:05
Secret vs. Public KD, TCJones, 11:03
Re: Signatures - Digital vs. nalog, Steve Kent, 07:11
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent, 07:03
Re: Signatures - Digital vs. nalog, Charles W. Gardiner, 06:39
Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Stephen D Crocker, 05:15
Signatures - Digital vs. nalog, TCJones, 04:51
Is PEM meeting our goals?, Doug Porter, 03:49
RE: Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 03:38

August 04, 1993

Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Stephen D Crocker, 15:57
RE: Responses, P . V . McMahon, 15:51
Responses, TCJones, 13:43
RE: Why are we here?, Doug Porter, 13:19
Re: Key & Signature responsibility, jueneman%wotan, 13:11
Re: Why are we here?, Steve Kent, 11:09
Why are we here?, TCJones, 09:40
Re: PEM request, Steve Kent, 09:13
Re: PEM request, Pierre Pacchioni, 07:30
GREEN Book access, P . Williams, 05:31
EMIB Task Group, DICKSC, 04:56

August 03, 1993

Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter, 20:19
Key & Signature responsibility, TCJones, 17:00
Re: Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, Steve Kent, 13:04
Re: Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, jueneman%wotan, 12:36
Re: Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, jueneman%wotan, 12:19
Re: Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, jueneman%wotan, 11:34
Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, Steve Kent, 09:56
Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, Stephen D Crocker, 09:19
Re: Policies for identity-based authentication, Steve Kent, 08:50
CEC Green Book distribution - FYI, Peter Williams, 07:07

August 02, 1993

Re: Policies for dealing with insecurely certified email, Doug Porter, 22:44
PEM request, Pierre Pacchioni, 02:03

August 01, 1993

Re: Policies for dealing with insecurely certified email, jueneman%wotan, 16:44
Policies for dealing with insecurely certified email, gnu, 14:05
Re: CACM article, Bill Neugent, 06:59