pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Purpose of PEM string

1993-08-17 06:52:00
On Mon, 16 Aug 1993 00:33:35 -0700, Doug Porter wrote:


Bob, your own comments have shown that a Persona will be treated as a
clown suit.

I don't get it Doug.  You say that you want privacy and don't care about trust
and authentication.  By using a Persona, at least, you have privacy.

Next, you complain that nobody will trust a Persona.  But I thought you didn't
care about trust and authentication!?!  You still have the privacy you asked
for.  People don't necessarily trust anonymous sources.  When I read a
newspaper and I see the words "anonymous sources" I lend less creedness to
whatever the statement.  People will treat Personas as just what they are, a
unique identifier bound to a public key; nothing more.

Like most people here I want privacy. I don't want third party
       ^^^^^^^^^^^
You do not speak for most people on this list, neither do I.  I suspect,
however, that most people on this list have been involved in the development
of the current standard, and it sounds a bit strange that most people would
develop a standard they don't want.

authentication or non-repudiation or chrome tailfins or fuzzy dice on
every single message. This obvious option isn't yet in PEM.

Doug

-William


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>