err......the more nice mapping of joe(_at_)foo(_dot_)bar(_dot_)com would be
cn=joe, dc=foo, dc=bar, dc=com, o=Internet
Joe is NOT a "domain component", he is a mailbox.
I agree that it is nicer to use commonName. That's the way I'd do it.
However, I wanted this example to be aligned with those in 1279.
<smart(_at_)mel(_dot_)dit(_dot_)csiro(_dot_)au> coincidentally sent a message
to
<osi-ds(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> on the same topic, and I believe
Steve Kille,
author of 1279, replied to it via that list.
-------------------------------------
Mark Wahl; M(_dot_)Wahl(_at_)isode(_dot_)com; ISODE Consortium