Steve, If PEM had privacy as its primary goal, I would be an enthusiastic developer. If it also did not tend to damage our freedoms, I would be a "PEM-evangelist", as you put it. Right now I'm wondering why these RFCs are called Privacy Enhanced Mail. We need genuine Privacy Enhanced Mail, not something else flying false colors. Doug
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: >Purpose of PEM, Doug Porter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Key & Signature responsibility, Doug Porter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is PEM meeting our goals?, Steve Kent |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |