Carl, I completely agree with your comments on privacy. You're also probably right about the two areas of interest. The focus on formal business documents explains the existing priorities in these RFCs, but not why they're called "Privacy Enhanced Mail". Let's change the content or the label. Doug
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: PEM Purposes, Doug Porter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Purpose of PEM, John Linn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: >Purpose of PEM, Carl Ellison |
Next by Thread: | RE: PEM Purpose, Doug Porter |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |