Mark, In reviewing old pem-dev mail I came across your response to my comment on the concept of having DNs as RDNs. I think the example]you cite (Dns appearing in MTA tables) is not really relevent to my comment. The MTA tables are not part of the directory and thus the inclusion of a DN in such tables is not an endorsement of DNs as RDNs. Steve
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: PEM and Gopher, p . churchyard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: DN subordination, Raymond Lau |
Previous by Thread: | Re: PEM and Gopher, p . churchyard |
Next by Thread: | installations, Peter Lipp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |