Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?

Steve, 

I think we are onto something here. I disagree with some of the
particulars of your analysis of my first message, and want to 
respond in more detail to clarify my thoughts.

But first let me get through the rest of the weekend's mail,
in particular digesting Peter Churchyard's message to Marshall 
Rose.

Bob

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, (continued) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Anish Bhimani Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Jeff Thompson Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, John Lowry Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan <= Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan

Previous by Date:	Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, John Lowry
Next by Date:	I hate mondays.., p . churchyard
Previous by Thread:	Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, John Lowry
Next by Thread:	Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]