PEM Dev (date)
February 25, 1994
- Re: exploring the technology, gluck, 15:56
- Re: DirectoryString character set, jueneman%wotan, 14:37
- Re: DirectoryString character set, Peter Williams, 13:47
- exploring the technology, LANDREVILLE-B, 10:36
- Re: DirectoryString character se, Richard . Ankney, 06:58
- Re: DirectoryString character set, Christian Huitema, 03:35
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Ed Switalski, 02:12
February 24, 1994
- Re: Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Mr Rhys Weatherley, 16:07
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Ashar Aziz, 13:15
- Re: DirectoryString character set, Peter Williams, 12:32
- Re: DirectoryString character set, jueneman%wotan, 12:14
- Re: DirectoryString character set, Mark Wahl, 11:33
- DirectoryString character set, jueneman%wotan, 10:44
- New Directions, peace, 09:51
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Christian Huitema, 04:07
February 23, 1994
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Mr Rhys Weatherley, 20:35
- New directions (was: Re; FYI), Steve Dusse, 15:33
- PGP & RIPEM, peace, 13:15
- X.500 directory for PEM users?, jueneman%wotan, 10:21
- Re: PEM and the NADF (Was: FYI), Marshall Rose, 10:20
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 09:47
- Re: Re: Re: FYI, jueneman%wotan, 09:22
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), jueneman%wotan, 09:06
- Yet another DUA tool ..., John Lowry, 09:05
- More DUA fun ..., John Lowry, 09:04
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Brad Huntting, 08:53
- Re: PEM and the NADF (Was: FYI), John Lowry, 08:50
- Re: Re: FYI, John Lowry, 08:42
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Mark S Feldman, 08:12
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Stephen D Crocker, 06:30
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Christian Huitema, 04:03
February 22, 1994
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Mr Rhys Weatherley, 23:56
- Re: PEM and the NADF (Was: FYI), Marshall Rose, 23:28
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Mr Rhys Weatherley, 22:12
- Re: New directions (was: Re; FYI), Stephen D Crocker, 21:18
- New directions (was: Re; FYI), Jeff Thompson, 19:47
- New directions (was: Re; FYI), jueneman%wotan, 17:52
- Re: FYI, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 17:39
- Re: Re: FYI, jueneman%wotan, 17:12
- FYI, Steve Dusse, 16:09
- Re: FYI, Bob Smart, 16:09
- PEM and the NADF (Was: FYI), jueneman%wotan, 15:20
- Re: FYI, John Lowry, 14:50
- Re: FYI, John Lowry, 14:13
- Re: FYI, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 13:33
- FYI, Steve Dusse, 10:49
- Re: FYI, John Lowry, 10:19
- Typo..., Stephen D Crocker, 10:07
- Re: FYI, Stephen D Crocker, 09:29
- Re: FYI, John Lowry, 07:48
- Ladder DES, Terry Ritter, 04:05
February 18, 1994
- FYI, Marshall Rose, 17:04
February 16, 1994
- help, Michael Barst, 11:09
February 15, 1994
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Theodore Ts'o, 22:39
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Derek Atkins, 17:34
- Re: PEM and PCAs, James M Galvin, 16:21
- Re: PEM and PCAs, James M Galvin, 16:15
- help, Michael Barst, 14:08
February 14, 1994
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Theodore Ts'o, 20:51
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Raymond Lau, 19:01
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Derek Atkins, 17:11
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Ashar Aziz, 17:11
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Raymond Lau, 16:15
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Theodore Ts'o, 14:54
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Theodore Ts'o, 14:54
February 11, 1994
- RSA's Low Assurance PCA Statement, Steve Dusse, 18:56
- Re: PEM and PCAs, James M Galvin, 11:52
- Nx2 DES Found Weak, Terry Ritter, 11:44
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Ashar Aziz, 11:29
- PEM and PCAs, Steve Dusse, 11:18
- The destiny of PEM, Sead Muftic, 10:32
- Re: PEM and PCAs, James M Galvin, 08:16
- Re: PEM and PCAs, jueneman%wotan, 06:53
February 10, 1994
- Starting Volume 5 of PEM-DEV archives, agent: David Balenson, 22:23
- Re: PEM and PCAs, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 21:31
- Re: Re: CA Names, warwick (w.s.) ford, 21:14
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate. (Was Re: Are X.500 names, warwick (w.s.) ford, 20:33
- Re: IPRA status, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 20:24
- PEM and PCAs, Jeff Thompson, 18:19
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, Jeff Kimmelman, 17:01
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, jueneman%wotan, 16:47
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 16:29
- Impediments to PEM deployment, jueneman%wotan, 11:50
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, jueneman%wotan, 10:08
- Re: TIS/PEM <-> MIME Info Wanted, James M Galvin, 08:39
February 09, 1994
- TIS/PEM <-> MIME Info Wanted, John Cole, 22:00
- Re: IPRA status, Raymond Lau, 16:11
- What does a revoked or expired certificate really mean?, dmcnh!gluck, 13:18
- Re: IPRA status, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 09:09
- IPRA status, Wolfgang Schneider, 04:13
February 08, 1994
- Re[2]: Proposed new X.509 certificate, burt, 18:38
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 17:33
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, kaufman, 16:53
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, jueneman%wotan, 12:12
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, jueneman%wotan, 11:17
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate - REBUKED, John Lowry, 09:49
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate, kaufman, 08:26
February 07, 1994
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate - REBUKED, jueneman%wotan, 18:32
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 17:33
- Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 16:41
- Re: DNs with competing DSA providers., Marshall Rose, 16:14
- Proposed new X.509 certificate - REBUKED, John Lowry, 15:52
- DNs with competing DSA providers., jueneman%wotan, 15:34
- Re: Re: CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 14:41
- Re:Proposed new X.509 certificate. (Was Re: Are X.500 names, jueneman%wotan, 14:35
- Proposed new X.509 certificate, jueneman%wotan, 14:05
- Re: Proposed new X.509 certificate. (Was Re: Are X.500 names feasible), John Lowry, 13:53
- Proposed new X.509 certificate. (Was Re: Are X.500 names feasible), jueneman%wotan, 13:20
- Re: DN/EN pairs, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 11:32
- DGSA NOW ON-LINE AT DTIC, DOCKMASTER, NIST, Robert W. Shirey, 09:24
- Re: DN/EN pairs, John Lowry, 08:41
- I hate mondays.., p . churchyard, 08:28
- Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 08:26
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, John Lowry, 08:18
- RE: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, p . churchyard, 06:03
February 04, 1994
- civil names versus listed name, Peter Williams, 23:07
- Re: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 22:46
- Re: PEM-DEV message to you, resent, Marshall Rose, 22:23
- DN/EN pairs, Stephen D Crocker, 22:07
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker, 21:57
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Jeff Thompson, 20:01
- Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 17:30
- Re: Re: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, jueneman%wotan, 17:10
- Re: CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 16:52
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan, 16:36
- Re: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, Theodore Ts'o, 16:18
- RE: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, Ned Freed, 15:39
- dealing with drivel, Peter Williams, 14:53
- Re: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, John Lowry, 14:52
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Anish Bhimani, 14:34
- Re: What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, p . churchyard, 12:38
- Re: Secure EDI, jueneman%wotan, 12:38
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible? (fwd), p . churchyard, 12:12
- Secure EDI, TCJones, 11:42
- What we really use instead of X.400/X.500, Carl Ellison, 10:48
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 10:18
- Certificate responders, jueneman%wotan, 10:08
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 09:50
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 09:49
- Re: CA Names, Steve Kent, 07:58
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, p . churchyard, 04:32
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker, 04:14
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Theodore Ts'o, 01:30
February 03, 1994
- Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, William C. Green, 23:45
- Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker, 19:14
- Re: Use of PEM increasing?, Anish Bhimani, 17:49
- Re: Use of PEM increasing?, Anish Bhimani, 17:34
- My new RIPEM 1.2b3 key, Jim Bidzos, 17:17
- Re: Some very general questions, jueneman%wotan, 16:17
- Some very general questions, Steve Dusse, 15:12
- Dname matching, TCJones, 12:47
- Re: Re: CA Names (text format of names, really), jueneman%wotan, 12:09
- Re: Re: CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 11:54
- Dname matching, jueneman%wotan, 11:39
- Re: CA Names (text format of names, really), Wolfgang Schneider, 11:11
- Re: CA Names, Stephen D Crocker, 09:37
- Re: CA Names, Paul C. Clark, 08:46
- Re: CA Names, John Lowry, 08:32
- Re: Syntax vs. semantics (Was: CA names), jueneman%wotan, 08:20
- Re: Use of PEM increasing?, John Lowry, 08:05
- Re: CA Names, Steve Kent, 07:48
- Re: CA Names, Jeff Kimmelman, 06:43
- Re: CA Names (text format of names, really), Christian Huitema, 06:30
February 02, 1994
- Re: CA Names, Mike Roe, 19:08
- Syntax vs. semantics, TCJones, 18:39
- Re: CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 18:23
- Re: CA Names, Stephen D Crocker, 17:25
- Re: Re: CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 17:10
- Re: CA Names, Stephen D Crocker, 16:35
- Re:CA Names, jueneman%wotan, 16:20
- Use of PEM increasing?, jueneman%wotan, 15:30
- Re: CA Names, Paul C. Clark, 14:49
- Re: CA Names, warwick (w.s.) ford, 13:53
- X.500 attributes, jueneman%wotan, 11:32
- Re: X.500 OIDs and attributes, jueneman%wotan, 09:38
- NxM DES, Carl_Ellison, 08:41
- Re: CA Names, Russ_Housley . McLean_CSD, 08:13
- Re: CA Names, Wolfgang Schneider, 07:03
- NxM DES, Terry Ritter, 00:48