From: tytso(_at_)ATHENA(_dot_)MIT(_dot_)EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 94 16:12:49 EST
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 10:03:27 -0500
From: James M Galvin <galvin(_at_)tis(_dot_)com>
With this feature, it is possible to support what is widely
purported as the PGP validation model:
This is, in fact, NOT the PGP validation model. There's enough
confusion about what the real PGP validation model without
needing some more...... :-)
Sorry, I disagree. What I said is completely consistent with what I
know to be the PGP validation model. Keep in mind I was proposing a
particular implementation of the model, not espousing the model. You,
of course, are free to disagree me.
However, as you suggest, we should take this discussion offline.
Jim
binKqfyOsw0Z4.bin
Description: application/signature