Re: Are X.500 names feasible?

But you never type in X.400 addresses, you select the one you want
from the directory services.... (:->

Pete.
It is a different mind-set to 'Internet centric' email.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, William C. Green Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Theodore Ts'o Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, p . churchyard <= Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast) Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Anish Bhimani Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker Re: Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, jueneman%wotan Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Jeff Thompson Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, John Lowry

Previous by Date:	Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Stephen D Crocker
Next by Date:	Re: CA Names, Steve Kent
Previous by Thread:	Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Theodore Ts'o
Next by Thread:	Re: Are X.500 names feasible?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast)
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]