My interpretation of these facts is that the rough consensus of the working group is to progress the document as specified.
Kangaroo consensus. In days of old when men were bold and authors unrelented, They ignored the majority to pursue the pejoritive And interoperability was prevented. ;-) Happy New Year (sigh-ning off), Steve Dusse
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: use of digest key selector (was: summary of technical issues), James M Galvin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: summary of technical issues, James M Galvin |
| Previous by Thread: | submit the documents to the IESG, James M Galvin |
| Next by Thread: | Hmm. (procedure stuff), Amanda Walker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |