pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Nonrepudiation and CA liabilities

1995-10-19 07:03:00
On Thu, 19 Oct 1995 Jueneman(_at_)gte(_dot_)com wrote:

I'm not sure that the cc number was being used as a _guarantee_ for the 
check, 
although I suppose it might have been. Rather, the somewhat vague hope of the 
merchants was that if someone had a credit card, he or she was probably good 
for the check, and if it bounced, the merchant might be able to get the 
consumer's name and address from the card association. This is the reason why 

I don't believe that.  I'm sure that 99.9% of the merchant intended to try to
put through a charge to the card if the check bounced.  Thus is was being
used as a guarantee, even if not a very solid one. 

merchants now record your drivers license number on the check -- I doubt that 
they expect the DMV to make good on the amount!

Actually, the real reason was probably a legitimate desire by card 
associations 
to deprive the merchants of a free credit check,  thereby forcing them to go 
to 
check approving systems who would charge a percentage of the transaction that 
would be similar to that charged by the card associations.

It has not had that effect because merchants are still explicity permited 
to require you to have a credit card and to show it to them.

Bob

Robert R. Jueneman
GTE Laboratories
1-617-466-2820 Office
1-508-264-0485 Telecommuting

Donald
=====================================================================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd     +1 508-287-4877(tel)     dee(_at_)cybercash(_dot_)com
   318 Acton Street        +1 508-371-7148(fax)     
dee(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com
Carlisle, MA 01741 USA     +1 703-620-4200(main office, Reston, VA)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>