perl-unicode

Fwd: Do Chinese use Katakana? What is 1988.enc (was: ISO-8859-1 vs ISO 8859-1 )

2002-03-20 07:56:46
This is a forwarded message
From: Anton Tagunov <tagunov(_at_)motor(_dot_)ru>
To: Nick Ing-Simmons <nick(_dot_)ing-simmons(_at_)elixent(_dot_)com>
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 7:35:43 PM
Subject: Do Chinese use Katakana? What is 1988.enc (was: ISO-8859-1 vs ISO 
8859-1 )

===8<==============Original message text===============
Hello, all! Hello, Nick!

Am I wrong?

2 me it looks that 1988.enc..

well it is the same as jis0201.enc with the only
difference: 0x24 ('$') is mapped somewhere up, mush be Yuan.

Well, I understand what 0201.enc is
(after all rfc1345 has  &charset JIS_X0201
 which is 8-bit and has
 - JIS Roman    (at 0x21-0x7E)
 - JIS Katakana (at 0xA1-0xFE)
)

But why does 1988.enc do?
It looks like someone has taken the
  &charset GB_1988-80
  &alias iso-ir-57
7-bit GB Roman (ASCII with a Yuan instead of $)
and has glued it together with JIS Katakana.

Do Chinese use Katakana? Does such encoding make
sense?

- Anton
===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
 Anton                            mailto:tagunov(_at_)motor(_dot_)ru