perl-unicode
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Change 15689: What started as a small nit (the charnames test, nit found

2002-04-05 22:26:00
from [Philip Newton] [Permanent Link] 
On 5 Apr 02, at 23:03, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:


On the other hand, it might make sense to have one flag that allows both
0xyyFFFE and 0xyyFFFF simultaneously (for yy = (0 .. 0x10)) -- perhaps
modify the UNICODE_ALLOW_FFFF flag or simly extend it to allow both
yyFFFF and yyFFFE..


I think this is the best choice: it makes no sense to control xFFFE and
xFFFF separately.


That's what I would have thought, too. Thanks.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <Philip(_dot_)Newton(_at_)gmx(_dot_)net>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  "Chracter set terminology survey" ready, Anton Tagunov
Next by Date:  Re[2]: - charset + character set + coded character set + CCS (?) (was: [Encode] Encode::Supported revised), Anton Tagunov
Previous by Thread:  Re: Change 15689: What started as a small nit (the charnames test, nit found, Jarkko Hietaniemi
Next by Thread:  "Chracter set terminology survey" ready, Anton Tagunov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]