Re: Encode API

> What's wrong with
>
>   use Encode ();
>
> ?
I do realize it's a style issue. I don't feel particularly strongly 
about this, but it just seems odd that a core module would do this.
Anyway, my point is that I just shudder at the thought of modules 
polluting my namespace by default in general. But I guess if you're 
going to take the "What's wrong with use Encode()" atitude ( which is 
fine, just not my style ), I guess there isn't much to go on for me. ;)
que sera sera
--d