Re: Change 16308: Encode tweak from Dan Kogai.

On Wed, 1 May 2002 09:45:05 -0700, jhi(_at_)iki(_dot_)fi (Jarkko Hietaniemi) 
wrote:

>               if (check & ENCODE_DIE_ON_ERR) {
>                   Perl_croak(
> -                     aTHX_ "\"\\N{U+%" UVxf "}\" does not map to %s",
> +                       aTHX_ "\"\\x{%04" UVxf "}\" does not map to %s",
>                       (UV)ch, enc->name[0]);
>                   return &PL_sv_undef; /* never reaches but be safe */
>               }
>               if (check & ENCODE_WARN_ON_ERR){
>                   Perl_warner(aTHX_ packWARN(WARN_UTF8),
> -                             "\"\\N{U+%" UVxf "}\" does not map to %s",
> +                               "\"\\x{%" UVxf "}\" does not map to %s",
>                               (UV)ch, enc->name[0]);
>               }
Shouldn't the formats match? That is, both '% UVxf' or both '%04 UVxf'?
(I would probably tend to '%04 UVxf', FWIW, since I consider \x{03c0} to
be "nicer" than \x{3c0} -- since I'm accustomed to four-char codepoints
in the Unicode book.)

Cheers,
Philip