David W. Tamkin <dattier(_at_)wwa(_dot_)com> wrote:
Er, not quite. The recipe's action is not a simple save-to-folder, and
the command after the pipe does not have an append redirector (">>"), so
there is no implicit name for the local lockfile.
Indeed.
The solution is to specify a name for the local lockfile:
:0b:savedfile.lock
* ^Subject: saveme
| cat > savedfile
However, putting a lockfile on a recipe like this is, of course, utterly
useless. So you might as well omit the locking entirely.
--
Sincerely,
srb(_at_)cuci(_dot_)nl
Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless).
"Listen very carefully, I shall only say this once."