procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Listproc and message-ID's

1996-09-16 08:24:39
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Tim Pickett wrote:

Why not have formail delete the old one (or extract it and store it)
with -I before adding your own with -A ?

formail -A should automatically replace the header field. I just wonder 
why it doesn't work with Message-ID:
E.g., formail -A "Subject: my subject" replaces the subject line, even if 
there is a subject.

Furthermore, I don't realy need the message ID for the complete digest, I 
just don't want it to end up in the ID cache I use for detecting 
duplicate messages (as it is possible that it's the same one as the last 
message in the digest).

- --
Guy Geens <guy(_dot_)geens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be>: Ph.D. 
student at ELIS -- TFCG / IMEC
Home Page: http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/ELISgroups/tfcg/staff/gg.html 
finger ggeens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be for PGP public keys (or use 
keyserver)

I hate this damn machine, I wish they would sell it.
It never does what I want, But only what I tell it.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: pgp fingerprints in message headers

iQBVAwUBMj1wrXwHoCha5QR1AQFFmwIAqnTZtnseuokU+7MxjzV0ga9b72IBsSca
n5vsHyzAq0PW67H/g7Y+jBBqjIuP0APE0imYCY8t/MqNS4QqGwmDxw==
=dxYK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>