procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cc vs cc

1996-10-03 07:14:06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 3 Oct 1996, Matthew Jackson wrote:

I have been looking at why some of my recipes for Subject line cleanups
of mailing list have been failing. It seems that the ones that don't
work are due to the fact that they are cc'd to the list rather than
Cc'd. From the logfile, I can see the TO being expanded to a regexp with
Cc and from the header of the mail message it has cc: so it fails.

Remove the `D' flag from your recipe. Then, procmail will consider upper- 
and lowercase as being the same.
If you really need to differenciate between upper/lowercase, you can use 
the `D' flag and replace ^TO by (^TO|cc).

- --
Guy Geens <guy(_dot_)geens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be>: Ph.D. 
student at ELIS -- TFCG / IMEC 
Home Page: http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/ELISgroups/tfcg/staff/gg.html 
finger ggeens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be for PGP public keys (or use 
keyserver) 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: pgp fingerprints in message headers

iQBVAwUBMlO6PnwHoCha5QR1AQEkPAH/W+X1lIMdJHl9mnnlvDkYSwzayQ/bNKF0
8TX8fwVWcfL3cXpNLBttoKls48LsP8RVQCrQfpE5Df73RY1zI8f1fQ==
=76mA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>