Now lemme get this straight:
Even if I WERE to hack sendmail and do the following:
1) Add procmail as a delivery agent using the -a to accept the user
2) Add rules in Rulset 0 that would call this new delivery agent.
I'd STILL have problems with BCC's due to various other problems such as
sendmail collapsing duplicates, etc...
Is it the case that NO ONE has done this completely sucessfully?
If that IS the case, then does that mean that I throw my Solaris stock 2.4
sendmail in the crapper, throw my
procmail in the crapper and pull my hair out compiling and installing
V8.whatever sendmail and use THAT to deliver
mail to my thousands of virtual users on my dozens of virtual domains?
You can tell me. I won't cry. I'm all grown up. I can take the bad news.
================
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Philip Guenther wrote:
recipient. To force sendmail to do what you want, you have to get
sendmail to pass the env. recipient as an argument, otherwise duplicate
elimination will cause thm to collapse into one invocation. As for the
header, I've tried myself, and have never seen it done. I believe it
to require a source hack, but just passing the information via an
argument seems easier.
Yuck, that is not what I wanted to hear! Oh well. I'm over my head then,
even the bat book is no help here.