Tim wrote:
Autoresponders *should* GREP for a "Precedence:" line and if something
like "bulk", "junk", or "list" is in there, there should be no
autoresponse FYI. :^)
I searched through the RFCs concerning email. The only reference I found
to "Precedence:" said don't use it. I did this because I got in an
argument with a maintainer of a list that kept sending me email when my
procmail receipe sent a message received email back to his list. I, in a
high and mighty way told him they should be putting a precedence in
their header and I don't auto-respond to "bulk", "junk", and "list".
After sending this response I decided to search the RFC, and as I said
the only reference to Precedence was don't use it. Does anyone know of a
RFC that says it is legal and how to use it?
--
Ed Bruce
<Bruce(_at_)ha(_dot_)hac(_dot_)com>
<ebruce(_at_)iquest(_dot_)com>