On Mon, 05 May 1997 08:45:40 -0500 Philip Guenther
<guenther(_at_)gac(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Lance Cummings <lance(_at_)iac(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp> writes:
This is really starting to annoy me, folks . . .
Here are the last three entries from my procmail.log:
From procmail-d-request(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE Mon May
5 19:38:17 1997
Subject: procmail-d Digest V97 #106
Folder: formail +1 -eds /usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +procmail
1094
0
From lance(_at_)iac(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp Mon May 5 19:38:18 1997
Folder: /usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
44
5
From lance(_at_)iac(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp Mon May 5 19:38:26 1997
Folder: /usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
2194
6
The first one is procmail digest vol 97 number 106, which contains
the table of contents, which I don't want, and the first six messages,
which interestingly enough, include 1/2 of my last post to this list.
The second one is only this:
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 19:38:18 +0900
From: Lance Cummings <lance(_at_)iac(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp>
Subject: procmail-d Digest V97 #105
Folder: formail +1 -eds /usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +procmail
15602
Status:
Both this as the next one look like procmail.log entries that got mailed
to you. The only things I can think of that you should check for would
be a) do you ever use $LOGFILE in a recipe, and b) do you ever misuse the
'f' flag?
No, Philip. I don't have $LOGFILE in any of my recipes (there aren't that
many,
actually) and I don't have any 'f' flags.
Thanks, though.
Lance