Philip Guenther writes on 19 April 1997 at 18:55:26
Robin S Socha <uzs8kb(_at_)uni-bonn(_dot_)de> writes:
On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Philip Guenther wrote:
I seem to be one of the lucky few that never get to enjoy the interesting
recipes ;-/
>If you don't have libwww, just perl5, then the following _should_ work:
[...]
:0 fh
* =\?ISO-8859-[0-9]+\?Q\?
|perl -pe 's#=\?ISO-8859-\d+\?Q\?(.*?)\?=#$s=$1; $s=~s/\s+(\r?\n)/$1/g;' \
-e '$s=~s/=\r?\n//g; $s=~s/=([\da-fA-F]{2})/pack("C", hex($1))/ge;' \
-e '$s#ge;'
Blech! This is a downright *ugly* bit of code. Seems to me like a
"formail" option is the best place to deal with this, although I can
see that adding smarts about charsets and the like could add a fair
amount of overhead.
Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V. +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com