Re: Defining a common set of actions ?

> Or since it sounds like you're just looking for a way to do logical
> OR'ing, why not:
>
>       :0
>       * ! some test
>       * ! some other test
>       { }
>       :0 E
>       {
>           :0 Whc: vacation.lock
>           | (formail -r ... ) | $SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS -t
>
>           :0
>           $DEFAULT
>       }
>
> or any of the other ways of doing logical OR'ing in procmail.  For an
> example from the archive, take a look at:
I've always wondered why some folks seem to prefer using the negated
tests in front of a null block, followed by an "else" block, rather than
what seems to be more obvious form of weighted scores:

    :0
    * 2^0 some test
    * 2^0 some other test
    * -1^0
    {
        # if any test succeeds
    }

The exception, of course, is if "some test" or "some other test" are
already using weighted scores.

Alan