|Your comsat daemon is too old: it ignores the mailbox part of the biff
|message. You'll need to dig up a newer version (the linux or *BSD
|versions should work) and install it.
I don't think so, Guenther. In my test, I believe I get two
*entire* messages sent to the console. Two copies of the first
e-mail, which consists only of "Subject: ORDINARY MAIL <lf><lf> xyz".
The second e-mail (which differs slightly - "Subject: MAIL WITH
test IN IT <lf><lf> xyz") does *not* turn into a biff message.
So I'm still stymied ... yes? I'm going to include my
original EXAMPLE again, at the risk of offending ..
-jme
%--
EXAMPLE (where I have rm'd my /var/mail mailbox first,
and used a trivial .procmailrc, to test) ..
`.procmailrc' looks like
---
VERBOSE=on
LOGFILE=/tmp/PROC
:0:
* ^Subject:.*test
IN.testing
---------
My `/tmp/PROC' log file reports what I expect after
first an ordinary message, then a matching one
---
procmail: No match on "^Subject:.*test"
procmail: Locking "/var/mail/jme.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/mail/jme"
procmail: Opening "/var/mail/jme"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking "/var/mail/jme.lock"
From root Wed Jul 9 23:31:17 1997
Subject: ORDINARY MAIL
Folder: /var/mail/jme 297
procmail: Notified comsat: "jme(_at_)0:/var/mail/jme"
---
procmail: Match on "^Subject:.*test"
procmail: Locking "IN.testing.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=IN.testing"
procmail: Opening "IN.testing"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking "IN.testing.lock"
From root Wed Jul 9 23:31:47 1997
Subject: MAIL WITH test IN IT
Folder: IN.testing 304
procmail: Notified comsat: "jme(_at_)0:/home/jme/IN.testing"
---------
[ BTW, the last lines of each of these do correspond to the man page:
$LOGNAME(_at_)offset_of_message_in_mailbox:absolute_path_to_mailbox
]
BUT. Messages are delivered to my /var/mail/jme mailbox,
and the IN.testing folder, respectively, but the console gets two
*duplicate* messages that I enclose after the signature. THe first
is correct, it is the first incoming message. The second is not,
it should be the `MAIL WITH test IN IT' message!
ANy ideas?
-jme
--
John Eadie (JE46) Tel: (604) 922-5104 FAX: (604) 922-5194
COMPUTING ART Inc ~ since '82 ~ http://mindlink.net/c-art-w/
`Nowadays, we already have descriptions of descriptions.'
- Georg Cristoph Lictenberg 1742-1799
New mail for jme(_at_)c-art-w has arrived:
----
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 23:31:17 -0700
From: root (Super-User)
To: jme
Subject: ORDINARY MAIL
xyz
----
New mail for jme(_at_)c-art-w has arrived:
----
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 23:31:17 -0700
From: root (Super-User)
To: jme
Subject: ORDINARY MAIL
xyz
----