Re: fgrep catches too much

procmail

Re: fgrep catches too much

1997-07-11 07:05:00

 :0
 * !^X-Loop: noloops_for_wwgrol(_at_)fw\(_dot_)hac\(_dot_)com
 * ? formail -ISubject: | fgrep -i -f $SBDIR/nancynet.domains
 { INCLUDERC=$SBDIR/surespam.rc }


Thanks!   Besides solving the problem, you taught me two new things:  a
nested action can follow a brace (doesn't have to be first thing on the
line)  &  some 'forks' can be avoided by thinking about the sequence of
conditions.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
fgrep catches too much, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 Re: fgrep catches too much, David W. Tamkin Re: fgrep catches too much, era eriksson Re: fgrep catches too much, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 <=

Previous by Date:	Detecting Invalid User, Steve Knouse
Next by Date:	A comment about formail, W. Wesley Groleau x4923
Previous by Thread:	Re: fgrep catches too much, era eriksson
Next by Thread:	solved: multiple bypass lists for spam.rc, Timothy Luoma
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]