Terry Jones posted, addressing Rik Kabel,
| Anyway, I'm happy to read your reply (and David's modification of it),
| because I wasn't thinking about multiple lines when I posted, and I
| wouldn't have used \>, so thanks a lot.
And I want to thank Rik publicly as well for thinking of using \>* to handle
interruptions in the search phrase. It doesn't work for me because in my
uses I don't want to gloss over punctuation marks, but if Terry is trying to
ignore citation characters and borders, \>* (or maybe \>+) is just the right
thing.